rodent: have discolored teeth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, mammal
Weight: 0.64
, vertebrate
Weight: 0.62
, animal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings beaver
Weight: 0.77
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.76
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.72
, rabbit
Weight: 0.69
, house mouse
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
have discolored teeth 1.00
have yellow teeth 0.83
have orange teeth 0.81
has physical part teeth 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(rodent, have discolored teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(rodent, have discolored teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(beaver, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(beaver, has physical part teeth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(rodent, have discolored teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(rodent, have discolored teeth)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(rodent, have discolored teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(rodent, have discolored teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rodent, have orange teeth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(rodent, have discolored teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(rodent, have discolored teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(rodent, have orange teeth)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(rodent, have discolored teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(rodent, have yellow teeth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(rodent, have discolored teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(rodent, have orange teeth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(rodent, have discolored teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(rodent, have orange teeth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(rodent, have discolored teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(rodent, has physical part teeth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(rodent, have discolored teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(rodent, have yellow teeth)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(rodent, have discolored teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(rodent, have yellow teeth)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(rodent, have discolored teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(rodent, have yellow teeth)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(rodent, have discolored teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rodent, has physical part teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(rodent, have discolored teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(rodent, have discolored teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(rodent, have discolored teeth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(rodent, have discolored teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(rodent, have discolored teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(rodent, have discolored teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(beaver, has physical part teeth)