role: be at play

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents step
Weight: 0.62
, challenge
Weight: 0.59
, part
Weight: 0.55
, professional
Weight: 0.52
Siblings leadership
Weight: 0.67
, operation
Weight: 0.59
, tester
Weight: 0.54
, steward
Weight: 0.53
, cleaner
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at play 1.00
be used to play 0.96
be used to part in play 0.90
be used to act in play 0.86
be at stage play 0.84
wants to play tennis 0.79
wants to compete against someone 0.77
be used to actor to play 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(challenge, wants to compete against someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(role, be at play)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(challenge, wants to play tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(role, be at play)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(challenge, wants to play tennis)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(challenge, wants to compete against someone)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(challenge, wants to play tennis)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(challenge, wants to compete against someone)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(challenge, wants to play tennis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(role, be at play)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(challenge, wants to compete against someone) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(role, be at play)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(role, be at play)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(role, be used to play)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(role, be used to part in play)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(role, be used to play)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(role, be used to act in play)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(role, be at stage play)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(role, be at stage play)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(role, be at stage play)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(role, be used to play)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(role, be used to actor to play)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(role, be used to play)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(role, be used to part in play)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(role, be used to part in play)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(role, be used to act in play)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(role, be used to part in play)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(role, be used to act in play)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(role, be used to actor to play)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(role, be used to act in play)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(role, be used to actor to play)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(role, be at stage play)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(role, be used to actor to play)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(role, be at play)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(role, be at play)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(challenge, wants to compete against someone)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(challenge, wants to play tennis)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(challenge, wants to compete against someone)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(role, be at play) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(challenge, wants to play tennis)