role: be determined in setting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents position
Weight: 0.62
, step
Weight: 0.62
, challenge
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.58
Siblings leadership
Weight: 0.67
, snow queen
Weight: 0.59
, reconnaissance
Weight: 0.58
, tester
Weight: 0.54
, tiny tim
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be determined in setting 1.00
be determined in competitive setting 0.92
be in house determined 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(role, be determined in setting)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(leadership, be in house determined)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(role, be determined in setting)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(leadership, be in house determined)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(leadership, be in house determined)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(role, be determined in setting)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(role, be determined in setting)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(role, be determined in setting)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(role, be determined in competitive setting)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(role, be determined in setting)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(role, be determined in competitive setting)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(role, be determined in setting)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(role, be determined in competitive setting)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(role, be determined in setting)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(role, be determined in competitive setting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(role, be determined in setting)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(role, be determined in setting)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(role, be determined in setting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(role, be determined in setting)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(role, be determined in setting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(role, be determined in setting)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(leadership, be in house determined)