rom: be important to computer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents file
Weight: 0.56
, device
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, app
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cd rom
Weight: 0.56
, nokia
Weight: 0.33
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.33
, pda
Weight: 0.33
, crt
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to computer 1.00
be in computer work 0.93
be used in computer 0.93
be needed in computer 0.92
be needed in computer system 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(file, be used in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(rom, be important to computer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(file, be used in computer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(file, be used in computer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(file, be used in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(rom, be important to computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(rom, be important to computer)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(rom, be in computer work)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(rom, be in computer work)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(rom, be in computer work)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(rom, be used in computer)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(rom, be in computer work)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(rom, be used in computer)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(rom, be used in computer)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(rom, be needed in computer)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(rom, be used in computer)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(rom, be needed in computer)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(rom, be needed in computer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(rom, be needed in computer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(rom, be needed in computer system)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(rom, be needed in computer system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(rom, be needed in computer system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rom, be needed in computer system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(rom, be important to computer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(rom, be important to computer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(file, be used in computer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(rom, be important to computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(file, be used in computer)