rom: be in computer work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents file
Weight: 0.56
, device
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, app
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cd rom
Weight: 0.56
, nokia
Weight: 0.33
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.33
, pda
Weight: 0.33
, crt
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in computer work 1.00
be used in computer 0.93
be important to computer 0.93
be needed in computer 0.91
be needed in computer system 0.88
work 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(file, be used in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(rom, be in computer work)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(app, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(rom, be in computer work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(file, be used in computer)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(app, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(file, be used in computer)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(app, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(crt, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(file, be used in computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(rom, be in computer work)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(app, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(rom, be in computer work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(crt, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(crt, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(rom, be in computer work)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(rom, be used in computer)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(rom, be used in computer)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(rom, be used in computer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(rom, be used in computer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(rom, be needed in computer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(rom, be needed in computer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(rom, be needed in computer)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(rom, be needed in computer system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(rom, be important to computer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(rom, be needed in computer system)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(rom, be important to computer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(rom, be needed in computer system)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(rom, be needed in computer)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(rom, work)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(rom, be important to computer)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(rom, work)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(rom, be needed in computer system)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(rom, be important to computer)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(rom, work)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(rom, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(rom, be in computer work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(rom, be in computer work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(file, be used in computer)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(app, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(crt, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(file, be used in computer)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(rom, be in computer work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(app, work)