rom: be shorter compared to ram

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents file
Weight: 0.56
, device
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, app
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cd rom
Weight: 0.56
, nokia
Weight: 0.33
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.33
, pda
Weight: 0.33
, crt
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be shorter compared to ram 1.00
be slower than ram 0.89
be before ram 0.84
differ from ram 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rom, be shorter compared to ram)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(rom, be shorter compared to ram)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(rom, be shorter compared to ram)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(rom, differ from ram)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rom, be shorter compared to ram)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(rom, differ from ram)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(rom, be shorter compared to ram)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rom, be slower than ram)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(rom, be shorter compared to ram)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(rom, differ from ram)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(rom, be shorter compared to ram)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(rom, be slower than ram)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rom, be shorter compared to ram)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(rom, be slower than ram)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(rom, be shorter compared to ram)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(rom, be before ram)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(rom, be shorter compared to ram)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(rom, be before ram)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rom, be shorter compared to ram)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(rom, be before ram)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(rom, be shorter compared to ram)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(rom, be slower than ram)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(rom, be shorter compared to ram)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(rom, be before ram)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(rom, be shorter compared to ram)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rom, differ from ram)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(rom, be shorter compared to ram)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rom, be shorter compared to ram)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(rom, be shorter compared to ram)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(rom, be shorter compared to ram)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rom, be shorter compared to ram)