rom: be slower than ram

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents file
Weight: 0.56
, device
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, app
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cd rom
Weight: 0.56
, nokia
Weight: 0.33
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.33
, pda
Weight: 0.33
, crt
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be slower than ram 1.00
be shorter compared to ram 0.89
be before ram 0.87
differ from ram 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(rom, be slower than ram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(rom, be slower than ram)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rom, be slower than ram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(rom, differ from ram)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(rom, be slower than ram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(rom, differ from ram)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(rom, be slower than ram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(rom, differ from ram)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rom, be slower than ram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(rom, be before ram)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(rom, be slower than ram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(rom, be before ram)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(rom, be slower than ram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(rom, be before ram)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(rom, be slower than ram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(rom, be shorter compared to ram)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(rom, be slower than ram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(rom, be before ram)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(rom, be slower than ram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rom, be shorter compared to ram)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(rom, be slower than ram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(rom, be shorter compared to ram)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(rom, be slower than ram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(rom, be shorter compared to ram)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(rom, be slower than ram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rom, differ from ram)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(rom, be slower than ram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rom, be slower than ram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(rom, be slower than ram)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(rom, be slower than ram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(rom, be slower than ram)