rome: was city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents civilization
Weight: 0.63
, republic
Weight: 0.60
, village
Weight: 0.58
Siblings egypt
Weight: 0.35
, georgia
Weight: 0.33
, roman republic
Weight: 0.33
, roman empire
Weight: 0.33
, islam
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was city 1.00
is city 0.96
was called city 0.96
was like city 0.95
was like city of mohenjo-daro 0.95
be called city 0.93
was big city 0.91
is important city 0.90
be considered city 0.90
was good site for city 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(rome, was city)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(rome, was called city)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(rome, was called city)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(rome, is city)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(rome, is city)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rome, be called city)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(rome, was like city)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(rome, be called city)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(rome, was like city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rome, be considered city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(rome, was called city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rome, is city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(rome, be considered city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(rome, is city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rome, was called city)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(rome, was good site for city)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(rome, be called city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(rome, was like city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rome, was like city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(rome, be called city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(rome, was good site for city)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rome, be considered city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(rome, be considered city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(rome, was good site for city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(rome, was good site for city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(rome, was city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rome, was city)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(rome, was city)