rome: was like city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents civilization
Weight: 0.63
, republic
Weight: 0.60
, village
Weight: 0.58
Siblings egypt
Weight: 0.35
, georgia
Weight: 0.33
, roman republic
Weight: 0.33
, roman empire
Weight: 0.33
, islam
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was like city 1.00
was like city of mohenjo-daro 1.00
was city 0.95
was called city 0.93
is city 0.92
be called city 0.91
was big city 0.91
is important city 0.89
be considered city 0.88
be called city of love 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(rome, was like city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(rome, was like city)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(rome, was like city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(rome, was city)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(rome, was like city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(rome, was called city)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(rome, was like city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(rome, was city)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(rome, was like city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(rome, is city)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(rome, was like city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(rome, be called city)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(rome, was like city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(rome, was city)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(rome, was like city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(rome, was called city)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(rome, was like city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(rome, is city)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(rome, was like city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(rome, was called city)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(rome, was like city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(rome, be called city)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(rome, was like city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(rome, be considered city)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(rome, was like city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(rome, is city)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(rome, was like city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(rome, be called city)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(rome, was like city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(rome, be considered city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(rome, was like city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(rome, was called city)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(rome, was like city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rome, be considered city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(rome, was like city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(rome, was city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(rome, was like city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(rome, be called city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(rome, was like city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rome, be considered city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(rome, was like city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(rome, is city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(rome, was like city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rome, was like city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(rome, was like city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(rome, was like city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(rome, was like city)