rooster: be in miami

Property	Similarity
be in miami	1.00
be allowed in nyc	0.79
be in hawaii	0.79
be illegal in nyc	0.77
be important to france	0.76

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(rooster, be in miami) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(rooster, be illegal in nyc)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.19

Salient(rooster, be in miami) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(rooster, be illegal in nyc)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(rooster, be in miami) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(rooster, be illegal in nyc)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(rooster, be in miami) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(rooster, be in hawaii)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.47

Typical(rooster, be in miami) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(rooster, be illegal in nyc)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.47

Typical(rooster, be in miami) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(rooster, be in hawaii)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.19

Salient(rooster, be in miami) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(rooster, be in hawaii)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(rooster, be in miami) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(rooster, be in hawaii)

Parents	animal Weight: 0.69 , bird Weight: 0.56 , pet Weight: 0.53
Siblings	llama Weight: 0.37 , guinea pig Weight: 0.37 , barn owl Weight: 0.37 , cape buffalo Weight: 0.37

rooster: be in miami

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible