rottweiler: have cropped tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.72
, breed
Weight: 0.72
, animal
Weight: 0.49
, great dane
Weight: 0.45
, child
Weight: 0.45
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.40
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.39
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.39
, dachshund
Weight: 0.39
, small dog
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
have cropped tails 1.00
have short tails 0.80
have clipped tails 0.80
cut tails 0.79
have cut off tails 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, have cropped tails)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have cut off tails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rottweiler, have cropped tails)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have cut off tails)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, have cut off tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rottweiler, have cropped tails)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(rottweiler, have cropped tails)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rottweiler, have cropped tails)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, have short tails)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rottweiler, have cropped tails)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, have cut off tails)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(rottweiler, have cropped tails)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, have clipped tails)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(rottweiler, have cropped tails)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(rottweiler, have short tails)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(rottweiler, have cropped tails)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(rottweiler, have clipped tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rottweiler, have cropped tails)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, have clipped tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rottweiler, have cropped tails)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, have short tails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(rottweiler, have cropped tails)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(rottweiler, have clipped tails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(rottweiler, have cropped tails)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(rottweiler, have cut off tails)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(rottweiler, have cropped tails)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rottweiler, have short tails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rottweiler, have cropped tails)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, have cut off tails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(rottweiler, have cropped tails)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(rottweiler, have cut off tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(rottweiler, have cropped tails)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(rottweiler, have cropped tails)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, have cropped tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(rottweiler, have cropped tails)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(rottweiler, have cropped tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, have cropped tails)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, have cut off tails)