rottweiler: have short tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dog
Weight: 0.72
, breed
Weight: 0.72
, animal
Weight: 0.49
, great dane
Weight: 0.45
, child
Weight: 0.45
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.40
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.39
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.39
, dachshund
Weight: 0.39
, small dog
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
have short tails 1.00
have cut off tails 0.89
cut tails 0.88
have clipped tails 0.84
have cropped tails 0.80
has tail 0.80
have docked tails 0.76
get tails docked 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(breed, have docked tails)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rottweiler, have short tails)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(dog, has tail)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rottweiler, have short tails)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(dog, has tail)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(breed, have docked tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(breed, have docked tails)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(dog, has tail)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have cut off tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have docked tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(breed, have docked tails)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, have short tails)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(dog, has tail)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, have short tails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have cut off tails)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, have cut off tails)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have docked tails)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, have docked tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(rottweiler, have short tails)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(rottweiler, has tail)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(rottweiler, get tails docked)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, has tail)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, get tails docked)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(rottweiler, have docked tails)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(rottweiler, have cropped tails)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, get tails docked)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, have cut off tails)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, have docked tails)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(rottweiler, have clipped tails)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, have docked tails)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(rottweiler, have cut off tails)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, have cropped tails)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(rottweiler, has tail)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(rottweiler, get tails docked)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(rottweiler, have cropped tails)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(rottweiler, have cut off tails)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(rottweiler, have clipped tails)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, have clipped tails)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(rottweiler, have docked tails)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, have cut off tails)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, have clipped tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, have cropped tails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, has tail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, have short tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rottweiler, have short tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dog, has tail)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(breed, have docked tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, have docked tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, have cut off tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dog, has tail)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(rottweiler, have short tails)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(breed, have docked tails)