routine: be good for babies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
, event
Weight: 0.56
Siblings feeding
Weight: 0.60
, exercise
Weight: 0.32
, ritual
Weight: 0.32
, happy hour
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for babies 1.00
be for babies 0.96
be for babies important 0.96
be important for babies 0.96
be important for infants 0.88
be good for child 0.85
be important for children 0.82
be important for toddlers 0.82
be important for child 0.81
be important for children 's development 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(routine, be good for babies)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(routine, be for babies)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(routine, be important for babies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(routine, be for babies important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(routine, be good for child)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(routine, be important for infants)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(routine, be good for child)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(routine, be good for child)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(routine, be good for child)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(routine, be for babies)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(routine, be important for toddlers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(routine, be important for children)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(routine, be important for child)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(routine, be important for babies)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(routine, be important for babies)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(routine, be for babies important)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(routine, be important for infants)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(routine, be important for children 's development)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(routine, be for babies)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(routine, be for babies)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(routine, be important for infants)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(routine, be for babies important)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(routine, be important for babies)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(routine, be important for toddlers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(routine, be important for toddlers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(routine, be important for children)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(routine, be important for child)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(routine, be important for children)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(routine, be important for infants)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(routine, be for babies important)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(routine, be important for child)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(routine, be important for toddlers)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(routine, be important for children 's development)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(routine, be important for children 's development)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(routine, be important for children)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(routine, be important for child)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(routine, be important for children 's development)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(routine, be good for babies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(routine, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(routine, be good for babies)