ruck: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vehicle
Weight: 0.36
, issue
Weight: 0.33
, ball
Weight: 0.28
, mess
Weight: 0.25
, penalty
Weight: 0.21
Siblings rover
Weight: 0.27
, police car
Weight: 0.26
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.26
, dump truck
Weight: 0.26
, cue ball
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
is worth 2018 0.93
has quality good 0.85
has quality bad 0.82
is net worth 2018 0.81
is net worth 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(penalty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ruck, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(penalty, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(penalty, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(rover, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(penalty, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(ruck, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(rover, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(rover, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(ruck, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(ruck, is worth 2018)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ruck, is worth 2018)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(ruck, is net worth 2018)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(ruck, is worth 2018)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(ruck, is net worth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(ruck, is net worth 2018)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(ruck, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(ruck, is net worth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(ruck, is worth 2018)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(ruck, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ruck, is net worth 2018)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ruck, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(ruck, is net worth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ruck, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(ruck, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ruck, is net worth 2018)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(ruck, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ruck, is net worth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(ruck, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ruck, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ruck, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ruck, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(penalty, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(rover, has quality worth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(ruck, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(penalty, has quality bad)