ruck: is worth 2018

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vehicle
Weight: 0.36
, issue
Weight: 0.33
, ball
Weight: 0.28
, mess
Weight: 0.25
, penalty
Weight: 0.21
Siblings rover
Weight: 0.27
, police car
Weight: 0.26
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.26
, dump truck
Weight: 0.26
, cue ball
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
is worth 2018 1.00
has quality worth 0.93
is net worth 2018 0.85
is net worth 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ruck, is worth 2018) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(rover, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ruck, is worth 2018) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(rover, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(rover, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ruck, is worth 2018) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(ruck, is worth 2018)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(ruck, is worth 2018) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ruck, has quality worth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(ruck, is worth 2018) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(ruck, is net worth 2018)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(ruck, is worth 2018) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(ruck, is net worth 2018)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(ruck, is worth 2018) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ruck, is net worth 2018)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ruck, is worth 2018) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ruck, is net worth 2018)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(ruck, is worth 2018) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ruck, is net worth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(ruck, is worth 2018) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(ruck, is net worth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(ruck, is worth 2018) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(ruck, is net worth)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ruck, is worth 2018) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(ruck, is net worth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ruck, is worth 2018) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(ruck, has quality worth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(ruck, is worth 2018) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(ruck, has quality worth)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(ruck, is worth 2018) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ruck, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(ruck, is worth 2018) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(ruck, is worth 2018) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ruck, is worth 2018)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ruck, is worth 2018) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(ruck, is worth 2018)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ruck, is worth 2018) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(rover, has quality worth)