rum: be better than vodka

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.74
, liquor
Weight: 0.63
, product
Weight: 0.59
, commodity
Weight: 0.58
, beverage
Weight: 0.57
Siblings whiskey
Weight: 0.38
, vodka
Weight: 0.38
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.38
, brandy
Weight: 0.38
, beer
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than vodka 1.00
be cheaper than whiskey 0.86
be called rum 0.77
be called white rum 0.77
give beer belly 0.76
be in bottle 0.76
come in bottle 0.76
be aged in used whiskey barrels 0.75
have with live yeast bottles 0.75
be called soft drinks 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(beverage, be called soft drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(rum, be better than vodka)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(beverage, be called soft drinks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(beverage, be called soft drinks)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, be better than vodka)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(vodka, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(brandy, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(beer, be in bottle)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(beer, come in bottle)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(drinking beer, give beer belly)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(beverage, be called soft drinks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(rum, be better than vodka)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(whiskey, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(whiskey, be better than vodka)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(vodka, be cheaper than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(vodka, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(brandy, be cheaper than whiskey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(brandy, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(drinking beer, give beer belly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(drinking beer, give beer belly)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(beer, be in bottle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(beer, be in bottle)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(beer, come in bottle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(beer, come in bottle)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(rum, be better than vodka)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(rum, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(rum, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(rum, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(rum, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(rum, be called rum)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(rum, be aged in used whiskey barrels)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(rum, be called rum)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(rum, be called rum)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(rum, be called white rum)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(rum, be called white rum)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(rum, be called white rum)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(rum, be called white rum)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(rum, be called rum)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(rum, be better than vodka)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(rum, be better than vodka)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(beverage, be called soft drinks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(whiskey, be better than vodka)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(beer, come in bottle)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(beer, be in bottle)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(drinking beer, give beer belly)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(vodka, be cheaper than whiskey)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(brandy, be cheaper than whiskey)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(rum, be better than vodka) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(beverage, be called soft drinks)