rum: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.74
, liquor
Weight: 0.63
, product
Weight: 0.59
, commodity
Weight: 0.58
, beverage
Weight: 0.57
Siblings whiskey
Weight: 0.38
, vodka
Weight: 0.38
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.38
, brandy
Weight: 0.38
, beer
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is cheap 0.79
be more expensive in australia 0.76
be expensive in montana 0.76
cost 99 0.76
be more expensive in texas 0.76
need cost 0.76
be more difficult than traditional products 0.75
be in canada expensive 0.75
be expensive in canada 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rum, is expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(liquor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rum, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(product, be more expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rum, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rum, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be more difficult than traditional products) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rum, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rum, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(liquor, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(product, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in canada)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(product, be more difficult than traditional products)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(product, be more expensive in australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(product, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(liquor, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in canada)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(product, be more expensive in australia)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(product, be more difficult than traditional products)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(vodka, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(beer, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is cheap)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(vodka, is cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rum, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(liquor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rum, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(product, be more expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rum, is expensive)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rum, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be more difficult than traditional products) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rum, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rum, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(beer, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(beer, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(vodka, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(vodka, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(whiskey, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(whiskey, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(brandy, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(brandy, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(vodka, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(vodka, is cheap)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(brandy, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(brandy, is cheap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(rum, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(rum, is cheap)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(rum, is cheap)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(rum, is cheap)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(rum, is cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rum, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(liquor, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(product, be more difficult than traditional products)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in canada)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in montana)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(product, be more expensive in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(whiskey, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(brandy, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(vodka, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(beer, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(brandy, is cheap)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(vodka, is cheap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(liquor, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(product, be more difficult than traditional products)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in montana)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in canada)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(product, be more expensive in australia)