liquor: be expensive in montana

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.66
, beverage
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, industry
Weight: 0.54
Siblings vodka
Weight: 0.70
, whiskey
Weight: 0.65
, rum
Weight: 0.63
, bourbon
Weight: 0.58
, moonshine
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in montana 1.00
be expensive in oregon 0.82
be cheaper in florida 0.81
be cheap in hampshire 0.80
be expensive in canada 0.78
be cheaper in california 0.78
be cheap in new hampshire 0.78
be expensive in australia 0.77
is expensive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in montana)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(rum, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(bourbon, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(moonshine, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(vodka, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(moonshine, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(moonshine, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(vodka, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(vodka, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(whiskey, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(whiskey, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(bourbon, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(bourbon, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(rum, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(rum, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in montana)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in oregon)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(liquor, be cheaper in florida)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(liquor, be cheap in hampshire)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in oregon)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in canada)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in canada)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(liquor, be cheaper in florida)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(liquor, be cheaper in california)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in oregon)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in australia)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(liquor, be cheaper in california)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in florida)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in canada)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(liquor, be cheap in hampshire)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(liquor, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheap in hampshire)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in california)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in australia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in australia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in canada)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(liquor, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in california)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(liquor, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in florida)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in oregon)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in hampshire)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in australia)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(liquor, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in montana)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(moonshine, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(rum, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(whiskey, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bourbon, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(vodka, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(liquor, be expensive in montana) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)