liquor: be cheap in new hampshire

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.66
, beverage
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, industry
Weight: 0.54
Siblings vodka
Weight: 0.70
, whiskey
Weight: 0.65
, rum
Weight: 0.63
, bourbon
Weight: 0.58
, moonshine
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheap in new hampshire 1.00
be cheap in hampshire 0.98
be cheap 0.84
be cheaper in florida 0.81
be cheap in goa 0.79
be cheaper in california 0.79
be expensive in oregon 0.79
be expensive in montana 0.78
be cheaper in pondicherry 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(liquor, be cheap in hampshire)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(liquor, be cheap in hampshire)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheap in hampshire)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(liquor, be cheap)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(liquor, be cheap)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(liquor, be cheaper in florida)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(liquor, be cheap in goa)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(liquor, be cheap in goa)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheap in goa)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(liquor, be cheaper in florida)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheap)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in oregon)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(liquor, be cheaper in california)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(liquor, be cheaper in california)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in hampshire)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in montana)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(liquor, be cheaper in pondicherry)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in oregon)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in florida)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(liquor, be cheaper in pondicherry)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in montana)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in california)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in oregon)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in goa)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in pondicherry)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in california)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in florida)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in pondicherry)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in oregon)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire)