liquor: be cheaper in california

Property	Similarity
be cheaper in california	1.00
be cheaper in florida	0.88
be expensive in oregon	0.83
be expensive in canada	0.81
be expensive in australia	0.80
be cheaper in pondicherry	0.80
be cheap in new hampshire	0.79
be cheap in hampshire	0.78
be expensive in montana	0.78
be illegal in alaska	0.78

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(liquor, be cheaper in florida)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in oregon)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in canada)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(liquor, be cheaper in pondicherry)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in australia)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(liquor, be cheap in hampshire)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in florida)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in montana)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(liquor, be illegal in alaska)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in canada)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in canada)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in pondicherry)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in oregon)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(liquor, be cheaper in florida)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(liquor, be cheaper in pondicherry)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in canada)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in florida)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in oregon)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in australia)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheap in hampshire)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in pondicherry)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(liquor, be illegal in alaska)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be illegal in alaska)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(liquor, be illegal in alaska)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(liquor, be cheap in hampshire)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in australia)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in montana)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in oregon)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.67

Salient(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in hampshire)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in california) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in australia)

Parents	alcoholic beverage Weight: 0.66 , beverage Weight: 0.61 , item Weight: 0.56 , problem Weight: 0.55 , industry Weight: 0.54
Siblings	vodka Weight: 0.70 , whiskey Weight: 0.65 , rum Weight: 0.63 , bourbon Weight: 0.58 , moonshine Weight: 0.52

liquor: be cheaper in california

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible