liquor: be cheap in hampshire

Property	Similarity
be cheap in hampshire	1.00
be cheap in new hampshire	0.98
be cheap	0.84
be cheaper in florida	0.81
be cheap in goa	0.80
be expensive in montana	0.80
be expensive in oregon	0.80
be cheaper in california	0.78
be illegal in alaska	0.76
be cheaper in pondicherry	0.76

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Salient(liquor, be cheap in goa)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheap in goa)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(liquor, be cheap in goa)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(liquor, be cheap)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in goa)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(liquor, be cheaper in florida)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in oregon)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in montana)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(liquor, be cheaper in california)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(liquor, be cheap)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(liquor, be cheaper in florida)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheap)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(liquor, be cheaper in california)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in florida)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(liquor, be cheaper in pondicherry)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in oregon)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in montana)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.90

Typical(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(liquor, be illegal in alaska)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(liquor, be cheaper in pondicherry)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in oregon)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in california)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in pondicherry)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(liquor, be illegal in alaska)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(liquor, be illegal in alaska)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in california)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in florida)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be illegal in alaska)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in pondicherry)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in oregon)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in hampshire) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheap)

Parents	alcoholic beverage Weight: 0.66 , beverage Weight: 0.61 , item Weight: 0.56 , problem Weight: 0.55 , industry Weight: 0.54
Siblings	vodka Weight: 0.70 , whiskey Weight: 0.65 , rum Weight: 0.63 , bourbon Weight: 0.58 , moonshine Weight: 0.52

liquor: be cheap in hampshire

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible