liquor: be cheaper in florida

Property	Similarity
be cheaper in florida	1.00
be cheaper in california	0.88
be expensive in oregon	0.83
be cheap in hampshire	0.81
be expensive in montana	0.81
be cheap in new hampshire	0.81
be expensive in canada	0.80
be cheaper in pondicherry	0.80
be expensive in australia	0.80
be illegal in alaska	0.77

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(liquor, be cheaper in california)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in oregon)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Salient(liquor, be cheaper in california)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in california)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in canada)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(liquor, be cheaper in pondicherry)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(liquor, be cheap in hampshire)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in montana)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in australia)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in canada)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in california)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in canada)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(liquor, be cheaper in pondicherry)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in pondicherry)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in oregon)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.88

Typical(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(liquor, be illegal in alaska)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in oregon)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheap in hampshire)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(liquor, be cheap in hampshire)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in canada)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in montana)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in australia)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in pondicherry)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in australia)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(liquor, be illegal in alaska)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(liquor, be illegal in alaska)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be illegal in alaska)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in oregon)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in hampshire)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in florida) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in australia)

Parents	alcoholic beverage Weight: 0.66 , beverage Weight: 0.61 , item Weight: 0.56 , problem Weight: 0.55 , industry Weight: 0.54
Siblings	vodka Weight: 0.70 , whiskey Weight: 0.65 , rum Weight: 0.63 , bourbon Weight: 0.58 , moonshine Weight: 0.52

liquor: be cheaper in florida

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible