liquor: be expensive in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.66
, beverage
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, industry
Weight: 0.54
Siblings vodka
Weight: 0.70
, whiskey
Weight: 0.65
, rum
Weight: 0.63
, bourbon
Weight: 0.58
, moonshine
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in australia 1.00
be expensive in canada 0.90
be cheaper in florida 0.80
be cheaper in california 0.80
be expensive in oregon 0.80
be expensive in montana 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(liquor, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in canada)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(liquor, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in canada)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in canada)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in canada)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(liquor, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(liquor, be cheaper in california)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(liquor, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(liquor, be cheaper in florida)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(liquor, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in oregon)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(liquor, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(liquor, be cheaper in california)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(liquor, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(liquor, be cheaper in florida)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(liquor, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in oregon)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in california)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(liquor, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in montana)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(liquor, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in montana)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in florida)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in oregon)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in california)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in florida)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in oregon)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(liquor, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in australia)