liquor: be expensive in oregon

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.66
, beverage
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
, industry
Weight: 0.54
Siblings vodka
Weight: 0.70
, whiskey
Weight: 0.65
, rum
Weight: 0.63
, bourbon
Weight: 0.58
, moonshine
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in oregon 1.00
be cheaper in florida 0.83
be cheaper in california 0.83
be expensive in montana 0.82
be expensive in australia 0.80
be cheap in hampshire 0.80
be cheap in new hampshire 0.79
be expensive in canada 0.79
be illegal in alaska 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in oregon)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(liquor, be cheaper in california)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(liquor, be cheaper in florida)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(liquor, be cheaper in california)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in canada)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in montana)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(liquor, be cheaper in florida)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in california)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in canada)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in california)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheaper in florida)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in montana)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in australia)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(liquor, be cheap in hampshire)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in canada)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in montana)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in canada)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheaper in florida)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(liquor, be cheap in hampshire)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(liquor, be illegal in alaska)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(liquor, be illegal in alaska)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(liquor, be expensive in australia)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheap in hampshire)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be illegal in alaska)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(liquor, be expensive in australia)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in montana)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(liquor, be illegal in alaska)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in hampshire)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be cheap in new hampshire)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(liquor, be expensive in oregon)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(liquor, be expensive in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(liquor, be expensive in oregon)