runt: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.49
, baby
Weight: 0.37
, story
Weight: 0.32
, everything
Weight: 0.31
, young
Weight: 0.24
Siblings chick
Weight: 0.31
, puppy
Weight: 0.31
, dog poop
Weight: 0.30
, big brother
Weight: 0.30
, beagle
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality joke 0.79
is best 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(story, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(runt, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(story, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(story, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(dog poop, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(chick, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(big brother, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(story, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(runt, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(big brother, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(big brother, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(beagle, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(beagle, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(chick, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(chick, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(dog poop, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(dog poop, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(runt, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(runt, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(runt, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(runt, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(runt, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(runt, has quality joke)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(runt, is best)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(runt, has quality joke)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(runt, has quality joke)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(runt, has quality joke)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(runt, is best)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(runt, is best)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(runt, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(runt, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(runt, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(story, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(chick, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(big brother, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(beagle, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dog poop, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(runt, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(story, has quality good)