:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(runt, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(beagle, is dogs)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(runt, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(runt, is dogs)
Similarity expansion
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(runt, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(runt, is best dogs)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(runt, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(runt, is best dogs)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(runt, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(runt, is best dogs)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(runt, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(runt, is best dogs)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(runt, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(runt, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(runt, is dogs)
Typical implies Plausible
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(runt, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(runt, is dogs)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(runt, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(beagle, is dogs)