salamander: has physical part tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.70
, creature
Weight: 0.67
, vertebrate
Weight: 0.63
, animal
Weight: 0.63
, reptile
Weight: 0.61
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.38
, endangered species
Weight: 0.38
, frog
Weight: 0.37
, tree frog
Weight: 0.37
, otter
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tails 1.00
lose tails 0.86
be called creatures with visible tails 0.85
be called creatures with tails 0.85
creatures with visible tails 0.84
creatures with tails 0.84
has physical part eyes 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(salamander, has physical part tails)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(salamander, has physical part tails)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(salamander, has physical part tails)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(salamander, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(lizard, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(frog, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part eyes)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(tree frog, has physical part eyes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(salamander, has physical part tails)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(salamander, lose tails)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(salamander, lose tails)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(salamander, lose tails)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(salamander, creatures with tails)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(salamander, creatures with visible tails)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(salamander, lose tails)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(salamander, creatures with tails)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(salamander, creatures with visible tails)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(salamander, be called creatures with visible tails)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(salamander, be called creatures with tails)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(salamander, has physical part eyes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(salamander, creatures with tails)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(salamander, creatures with visible tails)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(salamander, has physical part eyes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(salamander, be called creatures with visible tails)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(salamander, be called creatures with tails)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(salamander, has physical part eyes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(salamander, be called creatures with visible tails)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(salamander, has physical part eyes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(salamander, be called creatures with tails)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(salamander, be called creatures with visible tails)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(salamander, be called creatures with tails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(salamander, creatures with visible tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(salamander, creatures with tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(salamander, has physical part tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(salamander, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(tree frog, has physical part eyes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part eyes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(salamander, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)