salesman: work potential customer

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.69
, people
Weight: 0.59
, con artist
Weight: 0.57
, film
Weight: 0.53
Siblings stockbroker
Weight: 0.46
, salesperson
Weight: 0.37
, office worker
Weight: 0.35
, engineer
Weight: 0.35
, plumber
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
work potential customer 1.00
fool customer 0.79
welcome hotel customer 0.76
thank customer for purchase 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(employee, thank customer for purchase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(salesman, work potential customer)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(employee, welcome hotel customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(salesman, work potential customer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(salesman, work potential customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(employee, welcome hotel customer)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(salesman, work potential customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(employee, thank customer for purchase)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(salesman, work potential customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(employee, welcome hotel customer)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(salesman, work potential customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(employee, thank customer for purchase)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(employee, thank customer for purchase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(salesman, work potential customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(salesman, work potential customer)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(employee, welcome hotel customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(salesman, work potential customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(salesman, work potential customer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(salesman, work potential customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(salesman, work potential customer)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(salesman, work potential customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(salesman, fool customer)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(salesman, work potential customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(salesman, fool customer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(salesman, work potential customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(salesman, fool customer)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(salesman, work potential customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(salesman, fool customer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(salesman, work potential customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(salesman, work potential customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(salesman, work potential customer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(salesman, work potential customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(salesman, work potential customer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(salesman, work potential customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(employee, thank customer for purchase)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(salesman, work potential customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(employee, welcome hotel customer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(salesman, work potential customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(employee, thank customer for purchase)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(salesman, work potential customer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(employee, welcome hotel customer)