samsung: is best

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.68
, player
Weight: 0.63
, client
Weight: 0.62
, name
Weight: 0.60
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.68
, nokia
Weight: 0.38
, motorola
Weight: 0.36
, dvd player
Weight: 0.36
, smartphone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best 1.00
has quality good 0.76
be superior in way 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(samsung, is best)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(nokia, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(samsung, is best)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(nokia, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(nokia, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(smartphone, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(samsung, is best)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(samsung, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(samsung, be superior in way)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(samsung, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(samsung, be superior in way)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(samsung, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(samsung, be superior in way)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be superior in way)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(samsung, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is best)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(samsung, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(nokia, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(smartphone, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(samsung, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, has quality good)