smartphone: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.70
, ipad
Weight: 0.68
, web browser
Weight: 0.67
Siblings nokia
Weight: 0.70
, blackberry
Weight: 0.68
, android
Weight: 0.64
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.39
, cellular phone
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality worth 0.85
be good for business 0.80
be great for business 0.79
has quality evil 0.78
be good for education 0.77
be bad for us 0.76
send bad quality videos 0.76
is best 0.76
be better for business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(smartphone, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(web browser, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(smartphone, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(ipad, be good for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(smartphone, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mobile phone, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(smartphone, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be bad for us)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(ipad, be good for education)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(web browser, is best)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be bad for us)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be good for education)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(web browser, is best)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(android, send bad quality videos)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(nokia, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be great for business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be better for business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, is best)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(nokia, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mobile phone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(smartphone, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(ipad, be good for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(smartphone, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(web browser, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(smartphone, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(mobile phone, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(smartphone, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(nokia, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(nokia, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(blackberry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(blackberry, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(nokia, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(nokia, has quality worth)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(blackberry, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(blackberry, be good for business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(blackberry, be great for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(blackberry, be great for business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(android, send bad quality videos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(android, send bad quality videos)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(blackberry, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(blackberry, is best)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(blackberry, be better for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(blackberry, be better for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(smartphone, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(smartphone, be good for education)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(smartphone, be good for education)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(smartphone, be good for education)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, be good for education)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(smartphone, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be bad for us)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ipad, be good for education)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(web browser, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(nokia, has quality worth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(nokia, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(android, send bad quality videos)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(blackberry, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(blackberry, is best)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(blackberry, be good for business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(blackberry, be better for business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(blackberry, be great for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mobile phone, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ipad, be good for education)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be bad for us)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(smartphone, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(web browser, is best)