samsung: is camera

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.68
, player
Weight: 0.63
, client
Weight: 0.62
, name
Weight: 0.60
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.68
, nokia
Weight: 0.38
, motorola
Weight: 0.36
, dvd player
Weight: 0.36
, smartphone
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is camera 1.00
be blurry camera 0.91
is s8 camera blurry 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is camera)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(iphone, be blurry camera)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is camera)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(iphone, is camera)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(samsung, is camera)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(iphone, is camera)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(iphone, is camera)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(samsung, is camera)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(iphone, be blurry camera)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(iphone, be blurry camera)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(samsung, is camera)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(samsung, is camera)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(samsung, is camera)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be blurry camera)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(samsung, is camera)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(samsung, be blurry camera)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(samsung, is camera)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is s8 camera blurry)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(samsung, is camera)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(samsung, be blurry camera)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(samsung, is camera)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(samsung, is s8 camera blurry)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(samsung, is camera)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(samsung, is s8 camera blurry)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(samsung, is camera)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(samsung, be blurry camera)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(samsung, is camera)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(samsung, is s8 camera blurry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(samsung, is camera)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(samsung, is camera)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is camera)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(samsung, is camera)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(samsung, is camera)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is camera)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(iphone, is camera)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is camera)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(iphone, be blurry camera)