iphone: is camera

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pda
Weight: 0.69
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.69
, cell phone
Weight: 0.69
, samsung
Weight: 0.68
, electronic device
Weight: 0.66
Siblings ipad
Weight: 0.39
, smartphone
Weight: 0.38
, ipod
Weight: 0.38
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, android
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is camera 1.00
have camera 0.99
is back camera 0.96
be black camera 0.95
have best camera 0.94
is 5 camera 0.93
be blurry camera 0.91
is camera reverse 0.88
have 2 cameras 0.87
have two cameras 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(samsung, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(iphone, is camera)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(samsung, be blurry camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(iphone, is camera)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(samsung, be blurry camera)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(samsung, is camera)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be blurry camera)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is camera)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, have 2 cameras)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, have two cameras)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(samsung, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(iphone, is camera)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(samsung, be blurry camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(iphone, is camera)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(smartphone, have two cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(smartphone, have two cameras)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(smartphone, have 2 cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(smartphone, have 2 cameras)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(iphone, is camera)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(iphone, be black camera)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(iphone, have camera)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(iphone, be blurry camera)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(iphone, have camera)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(iphone, be black camera)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(iphone, be blurry camera)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(iphone, have camera)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(iphone, have camera)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(iphone, be blurry camera)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(iphone, be black camera)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(iphone, be blurry camera)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(iphone, be black camera)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(iphone, is camera)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(iphone, is camera)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(samsung, is camera)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(samsung, be blurry camera)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(smartphone, have two cameras)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(smartphone, have 2 cameras)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(samsung, is camera)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(iphone, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(samsung, be blurry camera)