iphone: have camera

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pda
Weight: 0.69
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.69
, cell phone
Weight: 0.69
, samsung
Weight: 0.68
, electronic device
Weight: 0.66
Siblings ipad
Weight: 0.39
, smartphone
Weight: 0.38
, ipod
Weight: 0.38
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, android
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have camera 1.00
is camera 0.99
is back camera 0.95
have best camera 0.95
be black camera 0.94
is 5 camera 0.92
be blurry camera 0.91
have two cameras 0.89
have 2 cameras 0.89
is camera reverse 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(samsung, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(iphone, have camera)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(samsung, be blurry camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(iphone, have camera)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(samsung, be blurry camera)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(samsung, is camera)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be blurry camera)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(samsung, is camera)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, have 2 cameras)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(smartphone, have two cameras)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(samsung, is camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(iphone, have camera)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(samsung, be blurry camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(iphone, have camera)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(smartphone, have two cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(smartphone, have two cameras)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(smartphone, have 2 cameras) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(smartphone, have 2 cameras)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(iphone, have camera)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(iphone, be black camera)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(iphone, is camera)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(iphone, is camera)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(iphone, be blurry camera)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(iphone, is camera)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(iphone, is camera)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(iphone, be black camera)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(iphone, be blurry camera)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(iphone, be blurry camera)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(iphone, be black camera)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(iphone, be blurry camera)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(iphone, be black camera)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(iphone, have camera)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(iphone, have camera)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(samsung, is camera)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(samsung, be blurry camera)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(smartphone, have two cameras)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(smartphone, have 2 cameras)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(samsung, is camera)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(iphone, have camera) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(samsung, be blurry camera)