san antonio: is hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new mexico
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.63
, los angeles
Weight: 0.63
, austin
Weight: 0.62
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.40
, san francisco
Weight: 0.40
, san diego
Weight: 0.39
, las vegas
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hot 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(new mexico, is hot)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(san antonio, is hot)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(los angeles, is hot)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(san antonio, is hot)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(austin, is hot)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(san antonio, is hot)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(austin, is hot)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(los angeles, is hot)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(new mexico, is hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is hot)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, is hot)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(austin, is hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is hot)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(san diego, is hot)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is hot)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(new mexico, is hot)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(san antonio, is hot)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(los angeles, is hot)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(san antonio, is hot)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(austin, is hot)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(san antonio, is hot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(las vegas, is hot)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(las vegas, is hot)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(san diego, is hot)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(san diego, is hot)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(san jose, is hot)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(san jose, is hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(san antonio, is hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(san antonio, is hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(austin, is hot)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(los angeles, is hot)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(new mexico, is hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(san jose, is hot)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(san diego, is hot)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(las vegas, is hot)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(austin, is hot)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(los angeles, is hot)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(san antonio, is hot)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(new mexico, is hot)