san jose: is hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san francisco
Weight: 0.80
, los angeles
Weight: 0.73
, california
Weight: 0.62
, oregon
Weight: 0.60
Siblings san diego
Weight: 0.44
, san antonio
Weight: 0.40
, las vegas
Weight: 0.38
, seattle
Weight: 0.36
, vancouver
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hot 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(california, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(san jose, is hot)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(los angeles, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(san jose, is hot)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(los angeles, is hot)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(california, is hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, is hot)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(california, is hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(san antonio, is hot)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is hot)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(san diego, is hot)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is hot)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(california, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(san jose, is hot)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(los angeles, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(san jose, is hot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(las vegas, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(las vegas, is hot)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(san diego, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(san diego, is hot)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(seattle, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(seattle, is hot)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(san antonio, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(san antonio, is hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(san jose, is hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(san jose, is hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(los angeles, is hot)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(california, is hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(seattle, is hot)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(san diego, is hot)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(las vegas, is hot)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(san antonio, is hot)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(los angeles, is hot)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(san jose, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(california, is hot)