san francisco: have at risk from powerful earthquake area

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san diego
Weight: 0.83
, los angeles
Weight: 0.74
, mexico city
Weight: 0.69
, north america
Weight: 0.67
Siblings san jose
Weight: 0.80
, vancouver
Weight: 0.62
, des moines
Weight: 0.61
, seattle
Weight: 0.60
, exploratorium
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
have at risk from powerful earthquake area 1.00
have at risk from earthquake area 0.97
be at risk for earthquake 0.94
be at risk of earthquake 0.94
be at risk for major earthquake 0.93
be at risk of catastrophic earthquake 0.90
be at risk of earthquakes 0.88
is earthquake hazard 0.87
prepare for large earthquake 0.86
be more vulnerable to earthquakes 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(los angeles, be at risk for major earthquake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(los angeles, prepare for large earthquake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(los angeles, be at risk of catastrophic earthquake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be at risk of catastrophic earthquake)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(los angeles, be at risk for major earthquake)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(los angeles, prepare for large earthquake)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be at risk of catastrophic earthquake)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, prepare for large earthquake)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, be at risk for major earthquake)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(vancouver, be at risk of earthquake)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(los angeles, be at risk for major earthquake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(los angeles, be at risk of catastrophic earthquake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(los angeles, prepare for large earthquake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(vancouver, be at risk of earthquake) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(vancouver, be at risk of earthquake)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(san francisco, is earthquake hazard)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, is earthquake hazard)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(san francisco, be at risk of earthquakes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(san francisco, is earthquake hazard)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, be at risk of earthquakes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(san francisco, is earthquake hazard)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(san francisco, be at risk of earthquakes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(san francisco, be at risk of earthquakes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(los angeles, be at risk of catastrophic earthquake)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(los angeles, be at risk for major earthquake)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(los angeles, prepare for large earthquake)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(vancouver, be at risk of earthquake)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(los angeles, be at risk for major earthquake)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(los angeles, be at risk of catastrophic earthquake)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(mexico city, be more vulnerable to earthquakes)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(san francisco, have at risk from powerful earthquake area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(los angeles, prepare for large earthquake)