san jose: be located in california

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san francisco
Weight: 0.80
, los angeles
Weight: 0.73
, california
Weight: 0.62
, oregon
Weight: 0.60
Siblings san diego
Weight: 0.44
, san antonio
Weight: 0.40
, las vegas
Weight: 0.38
, seattle
Weight: 0.36
, vancouver
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be located in california 1.00
is located 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(san jose, be located in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is located)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(san jose, be located in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(vancouver, is located)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(san jose, be located in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(vancouver, is located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(vancouver, is located)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(san jose, be located in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(seattle, is located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(seattle, is located)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(san jose, be located in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(san jose, be located in california)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(san jose, be located in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(san jose, is located)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(san jose, be located in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(san jose, is located)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(san jose, be located in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(san jose, is located)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(san jose, be located in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is located)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(san jose, be located in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(san jose, be located in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(san jose, be located in california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(san jose, be located in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(san jose, be located in california)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(san jose, be located in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(vancouver, is located)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(san jose, be located in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(seattle, is located)