san jose: is located

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san francisco
Weight: 0.80
, los angeles
Weight: 0.73
, california
Weight: 0.62
, oregon
Weight: 0.60
Siblings san diego
Weight: 0.44
, san antonio
Weight: 0.40
, las vegas
Weight: 0.38
, seattle
Weight: 0.36
, vancouver
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is located 1.00
be located in california 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is located)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(vancouver, is located)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(san jose, is located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(vancouver, is located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(vancouver, is located)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(san jose, is located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(seattle, is located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(seattle, is located)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(san jose, is located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(san jose, is located)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(san jose, is located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(san jose, be located in california)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(san jose, is located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(san jose, be located in california)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(san jose, is located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(san jose, be located in california)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(san jose, is located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(san jose, be located in california)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(san jose, is located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(san jose, is located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is located)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(san jose, is located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(san jose, is located)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(vancouver, is located)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is located) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(seattle, is located)