san jose: has quality smoke

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents san francisco
Weight: 0.80
, los angeles
Weight: 0.73
, california
Weight: 0.62
, oregon
Weight: 0.60
Siblings san diego
Weight: 0.44
, san antonio
Weight: 0.40
, las vegas
Weight: 0.38
, seattle
Weight: 0.36
, vancouver
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality smoke 1.00
is smoky 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san jose, has quality smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(seattle, has quality smoke)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san jose, has quality smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(seattle, is smoky)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(san jose, has quality smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(seattle, has quality smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(seattle, has quality smoke)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(san jose, has quality smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(seattle, is smoky) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(seattle, is smoky)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(san jose, has quality smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(san jose, has quality smoke)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(san jose, has quality smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(san jose, is smoky)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(san jose, has quality smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(san jose, is smoky)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(san jose, has quality smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(san jose, is smoky)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(san jose, has quality smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(san jose, is smoky)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(san jose, has quality smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(san jose, has quality smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san jose, has quality smoke)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(san jose, has quality smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(san jose, has quality smoke)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san jose, has quality smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(seattle, has quality smoke)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(san jose, has quality smoke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(seattle, is smoky)