sandwich: be bad at math

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.67
, snack
Weight: 0.66
, meal
Weight: 0.64
, item
Weight: 0.63
Siblings breakfast
Weight: 0.69
, cheeseburger
Weight: 0.68
, burrito
Weight: 0.66
, taco
Weight: 0.65
, dessert
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad at math 1.00
affect high school students 0.77
is important science 0.76
affect school students 0.76
is science 0.76
be important for students 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be bad at math)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(breakfast, affect high school students)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be bad at math)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(breakfast, is important science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be bad at math)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(breakfast, affect school students)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be bad at math)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(breakfast, be important for students)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(sandwich, be bad at math)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(breakfast, affect high school students)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(breakfast, affect high school students)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(sandwich, be bad at math)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(breakfast, affect school students)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(breakfast, affect school students)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(sandwich, be bad at math)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(breakfast, is important science)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(breakfast, is important science)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(sandwich, be bad at math)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(breakfast, be important for students)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(breakfast, be important for students)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(sandwich, be bad at math)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(sandwich, be bad at math)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(sandwich, be bad at math)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sandwich, be bad at math)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be bad at math)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(sandwich, be bad at math)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(sandwich, be bad at math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be bad at math)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(breakfast, affect high school students)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be bad at math)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(breakfast, affect school students)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be bad at math)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(breakfast, is important science)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be bad at math)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(breakfast, be important for students)