satan: was in garden of eden in first place

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents god
Weight: 0.66
, enemy
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.64
, demon
Weight: 0.63
, deity
Weight: 0.61
Siblings jesus christ
Weight: 0.37
, saddam hussein
Weight: 0.36
, devil
Weight: 0.36
, jesus
Weight: 0.36
, lord
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was in garden of eden in first place 1.00
was in garden of eden in place 0.99
was in garden of eden 0.96
was in garden in first place 0.94
was in garden in place 0.94
was in garden 0.92
was present in garden of gethsemane 0.88
was present in garden 0.88
was in garden with adam 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(satan, was in garden of eden in first place)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(satan, was in garden of eden in place)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(satan, was in garden of eden)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(satan, was in garden of eden)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(satan, was in garden of eden in place)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(satan, was in garden of eden)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(satan, was in garden of eden in place)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(satan, was in garden in place)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(satan, was in garden in first place)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(satan, was in garden)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(satan, was in garden)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(satan, was in garden in place)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(satan, was in garden in first place)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(satan, was in garden)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(satan, was in garden in place)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(satan, was present in garden)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(satan, was in garden in first place)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(satan, was present in garden)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(satan, was in garden with adam)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(satan, was in garden with adam)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(satan, was present in garden)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(satan, was in garden with adam)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(satan, was in garden)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(satan, was in garden of eden)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(satan, was in garden in first place)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(satan, was in garden in place)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(satan, was present in garden)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(satan, was in garden of eden in place)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(satan, was in garden with adam)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(satan, was in garden of eden in first place)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(satan, was in garden of eden in first place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(satan, was in garden of eden in first place)