satan: was present in garden of gethsemane

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents god
Weight: 0.66
, enemy
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.64
, demon
Weight: 0.63
, deity
Weight: 0.61
Siblings jesus christ
Weight: 0.37
, saddam hussein
Weight: 0.36
, devil
Weight: 0.36
, jesus
Weight: 0.36
, lord
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was present in garden of gethsemane 1.00
was present in garden 1.00
was in garden 0.94
was in garden in place 0.92
was in garden in first place 0.91
was in garden of eden in first place 0.88
was in garden of eden in place 0.88
was in garden of eden 0.88
was in garden with adam 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(satan, was present in garden)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(satan, was present in garden)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(satan, was in garden)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(satan, was present in garden)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(satan, was in garden)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(satan, was in garden)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(satan, was present in garden)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(satan, was in garden in place)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(satan, was in garden of eden)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(satan, was in garden)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(satan, was in garden in place)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(satan, was in garden of eden)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(satan, was in garden in first place)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(satan, was in garden of eden in place)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(satan, was in garden of eden)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(satan, was in garden in place)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(satan, was in garden in first place)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(satan, was in garden of eden in first place)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(satan, was in garden of eden in place)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(satan, was in garden in first place)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(satan, was in garden of eden in place)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(satan, was in garden of eden in first place)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(satan, was in garden with adam)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(satan, was in garden in first place)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(satan, was in garden with adam)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(satan, was in garden of eden in first place)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(satan, was in garden in place)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(satan, was in garden with adam)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(satan, was in garden of eden)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(satan, was in garden of eden in first place)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(satan, was in garden with adam)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(satan, was in garden of eden in place)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(satan, was present in garden of gethsemane)