saving: be good for economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, operation
Weight: 0.55
, feature
Weight: 0.54
, topic
Weight: 0.51
, issue
Weight: 0.49
Siblings screen saver
Weight: 0.34
, giving
Weight: 0.31
, human life
Weight: 0.31
, living thing
Weight: 0.31
, talking
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for economy 1.00
be important for economy 0.96
help economy 0.92
help economy as whole 0.90
feel good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(saving, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(giving, feel good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(saving, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(giving, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(giving, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(saving, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(saving, be good for economy)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(saving, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(saving, help economy)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(saving, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(saving, be important for economy)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(saving, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(saving, help economy)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(saving, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(saving, be important for economy)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(saving, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(saving, be important for economy)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(saving, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(saving, help economy as whole)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(saving, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(saving, help economy as whole)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(saving, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(saving, help economy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(saving, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(saving, help economy as whole)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(saving, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(saving, be important for economy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(saving, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(saving, feel good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(saving, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(saving, feel good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(saving, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(saving, feel good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(saving, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(saving, help economy as whole)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(saving, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(saving, help economy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(saving, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(saving, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(saving, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(saving, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(saving, be good for economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(saving, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(saving, be good for economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(saving, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(giving, feel good)