scale: be important in art

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents element
Weight: 0.63
, instrument
Weight: 0.63
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, detail
Weight: 0.61
Siblings scope
Weight: 0.33
, magnitude
Weight: 0.33
, quantity
Weight: 0.33
, dimension
Weight: 0.32
, nature
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in art 1.00
be important in music 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(element, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(scale, be important in art)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(detail, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(scale, be important in art)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(instrument, be important in music)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(scale, be important in art)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(scale, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(detail, be important in art)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(scale, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(element, be important in art)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(scale, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(instrument, be important in music)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scale, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(detail, be important in art)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scale, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(element, be important in art)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scale, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be important in music)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(element, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(scale, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(scale, be important in art)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(detail, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(scale, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(scale, be important in art)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(instrument, be important in music)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(scale, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(scale, be important in art)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(scale, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(scale, be important in art)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(scale, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(scale, be important in music)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(scale, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(scale, be important in music)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(scale, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(scale, be important in music)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(scale, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(scale, be important in music)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(scale, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(scale, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scale, be important in art)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(scale, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(scale, be important in art)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scale, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(instrument, be important in music)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scale, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(detail, be important in art)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(scale, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(element, be important in art)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(scale, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(detail, be important in art)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(scale, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(element, be important in art)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(scale, be important in art)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(instrument, be important in music)