:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(feature, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(scaling, work)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(process, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(scaling, work)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(function, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(scaling, work)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(operation, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(scaling, work)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(function, works)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(scaling, work)
...
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(operation, work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(function, work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(process, work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(feature, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(function, works)
...
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(feature, work)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(process, work)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(function, work)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(operation, work)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(function, works)
...
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(shrinking, work)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(feature, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(scaling, work)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(process, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(scaling, work)
...
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(scaling, work)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(scaling, work)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(operation, work)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(process, work)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(function, work)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(function, works)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(feature, work)
...
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(shrinking, work)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(operation, work)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(process, work)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(function, work)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(feature, work)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(scaling, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(function, works)
...