scandinavia: is underpopulated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.57
, country
Weight: 0.53
, culture
Weight: 0.52
, location
Weight: 0.52
, region
Weight: 0.50
Siblings central african republic
Weight: 0.28
, convenience store
Weight: 0.28
, city hall
Weight: 0.28
, spot
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
is underpopulated 1.00
is sparsely populated 0.76
is populated 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(region, is sparsely populated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(scandinavia, is underpopulated)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(region, is populated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(scandinavia, is underpopulated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(scandinavia, is underpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(region, is populated)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(scandinavia, is underpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(region, is sparsely populated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(scandinavia, is underpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(region, is sparsely populated)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(scandinavia, is underpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(region, is populated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(region, is sparsely populated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(scandinavia, is underpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(scandinavia, is underpopulated)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(region, is populated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(scandinavia, is underpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(scandinavia, is underpopulated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(scandinavia, is underpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(scandinavia, is underpopulated)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(scandinavia, is underpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(scandinavia, is populated)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(scandinavia, is underpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(scandinavia, is sparsely populated)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(scandinavia, is underpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(scandinavia, is populated)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(scandinavia, is underpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(scandinavia, is sparsely populated)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(scandinavia, is underpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(scandinavia, is sparsely populated)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(scandinavia, is underpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(scandinavia, is sparsely populated)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(scandinavia, is underpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(scandinavia, is populated)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(scandinavia, is underpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(scandinavia, is populated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(scandinavia, is underpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(scandinavia, is underpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(scandinavia, is underpopulated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(scandinavia, is underpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(scandinavia, is underpopulated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(scandinavia, is underpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(region, is populated)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(scandinavia, is underpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(region, is sparsely populated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(scandinavia, is underpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(region, is populated)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(scandinavia, is underpopulated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(region, is sparsely populated)