scientist: use microscope

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents researcher
Weight: 0.70
, author
Weight: 0.69
, expert
Weight: 0.68
, activist
Weight: 0.66
Siblings geneticist
Weight: 0.74
, physicist
Weight: 0.74
, meteorologist
Weight: 0.72
, geologist
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
use microscope 1.00
use microscopes 0.84
use adjustment knob on microscope 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(geologist, use microscopes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(scientist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(geologist, use microscopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(geologist, use microscopes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(scientist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(scientist, use microscope)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(scientist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(scientist, use microscopes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(scientist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(scientist, use microscopes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(scientist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(scientist, use adjustment knob on microscope)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(scientist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(scientist, use adjustment knob on microscope)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(scientist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(scientist, use microscopes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(scientist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(scientist, use adjustment knob on microscope)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(scientist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use microscopes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(scientist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use adjustment knob on microscope)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(scientist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(scientist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use microscope)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(scientist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(scientist, use microscope)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use microscope) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(geologist, use microscopes)