scientist: use microscopes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents researcher
Weight: 0.70
, author
Weight: 0.69
, expert
Weight: 0.68
, activist
Weight: 0.66
Siblings geneticist
Weight: 0.74
, physicist
Weight: 0.74
, meteorologist
Weight: 0.72
, geologist
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
use microscopes 1.00
use microscope 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use microscopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(geologist, use microscopes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(scientist, use microscopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(geologist, use microscopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(geologist, use microscopes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(scientist, use microscopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(scientist, use microscopes)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(scientist, use microscopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(scientist, use microscope)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(scientist, use microscopes) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(scientist, use microscope)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(scientist, use microscopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(scientist, use microscope)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(scientist, use microscopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use microscope)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(scientist, use microscopes) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(scientist, use microscopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use microscopes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(scientist, use microscopes) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(scientist, use microscopes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use microscopes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(geologist, use microscopes)