scotch: be more costly than similarly aged port

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents whiskey
Weight: 0.68
, product
Weight: 0.59
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.59
, spirit
Weight: 0.53
, drink
Weight: 0.53
Siblings bourbon
Weight: 0.36
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.36
, vodka
Weight: 0.36
, brandy
Weight: 0.36
, scotch tape
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more costly than similarly aged port 1.00
be more costly than aged port 0.96
be more costly than port 0.90
is typically aged longer than bourbon 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(scotch, be more costly than similarly aged port)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(scotch, be more costly than similarly aged port)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(scotch, be more costly than similarly aged port)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(scotch, be more costly than aged port)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than similarly aged port)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than aged port)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(scotch, be more costly than similarly aged port)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(scotch, be more costly than aged port)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(scotch, be more costly than similarly aged port)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(scotch, be more costly than aged port)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(scotch, be more costly than similarly aged port)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(scotch, be more costly than port)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than similarly aged port)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(scotch, be more costly than similarly aged port)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(scotch, be more costly than port)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(scotch, be more costly than similarly aged port)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(scotch, be more costly than port)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(scotch, be more costly than similarly aged port)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(scotch, be more costly than similarly aged port)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(scotch, be more costly than similarly aged port)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than similarly aged port)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is typically aged longer than bourbon)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(scotch, be more costly than similarly aged port)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(scotch, be more costly than similarly aged port)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than similarly aged port)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(scotch, be more costly than similarly aged port)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(scotch, be more costly than similarly aged port)