scotch: be more costly than port

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents whiskey
Weight: 0.68
, product
Weight: 0.59
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.59
, spirit
Weight: 0.53
, drink
Weight: 0.53
Siblings bourbon
Weight: 0.36
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.36
, vodka
Weight: 0.36
, brandy
Weight: 0.36
, scotch tape
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more costly than port 1.00
be more costly than aged port 0.93
be more costly than similarly aged port 0.90
is expensive 0.79
cost more 0.77
be expensive on cruise ships 0.77
be more difficult than products 0.76
be more difficult than traditional products 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(scotch, be more costly than port)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(drink, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(scotch, be more costly than port)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(whiskey, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(scotch, be more costly than port)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(product, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(scotch, be more costly than port)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be more difficult than traditional products) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(scotch, be more costly than port)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(product, be more difficult than traditional products)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(product, cost more)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(whiskey, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(drink, is expensive)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(product, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(product, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(drink, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(product, cost more)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(product, be more difficult than traditional products)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(bourbon, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(vodka, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(scotch, be more costly than port)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(drink, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(scotch, be more costly than port)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(whiskey, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(scotch, be more costly than port)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(product, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(scotch, be more costly than port)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be more difficult than traditional products) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(scotch, be more costly than port)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(vodka, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(vodka, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(bourbon, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(bourbon, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(brandy, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(brandy, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(scotch, be more costly than port)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(scotch, be more costly than aged port)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than aged port)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(scotch, be more costly than aged port)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(scotch, be more costly than aged port)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(scotch, be more costly than similarly aged port)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than similarly aged port)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(scotch, be more costly than similarly aged port)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(scotch, be more costly than similarly aged port)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(scotch, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(scotch, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(scotch, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(scotch, be more costly than port)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(product, be more difficult than traditional products)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(product, cost more)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drink, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(whiskey, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bourbon, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(brandy, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(vodka, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(product, be more difficult than traditional products)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(product, cost more)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drink, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(whiskey, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(scotch, be more costly than port) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)